|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Sept 15, 2005 22:46:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Sept 16, 2005 9:35:42 GMT -5
Are these the actual rankings?
If they are some players are way tooo high!
|
|
|
|
Post by Portland Trail Blazers on Sept 16, 2005 10:58:05 GMT -5
Are these the actual rankings? If they are some players are way tooo high! i honestly dont think that was the problem. I guess its Called Live 2k6 for a reason. So they based it on potential and also how good they will be in the future. thus..josh smith is an 80..cause damn i do think he has a bright future..especially in 2006 Check out..Prince from detroit..ranking of 84 Hamilton a ranking of 76..or something...is he really that much better?. Another example...shaq 90, wade 91, lebron 95.. Either way its based on future..so whatever the ratings..i guess everyone has their own opinion on whos better or what not. |
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Sept 16, 2005 13:53:15 GMT -5
look at thingd like.. ricky davis is a 74 even though he is entering his prime and was a runner up for 6th man last year, yet josh smith who really didn't show that much last year is an 80. I'd say that Smith is one of the worst ratings, but the other thing is there seem to be alot of people like davis who are really solid players who haven't gone up much. with regards to Smith, do you really think he's the second best of last year's rookies? And from your examples, do you really think josh Smith is going to have a better year than Rip Hamilton, because I highly doubt that, just can't see it happening, there is really no basis for them to thinkSmith willl be that good. He was a 9 and 6 and 2 guy lst year, he'd have to make a fairly significant jump to be 4 points overall better than Rip.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Sept 16, 2005 14:18:37 GMT -5
it dosnt work for me for some reason but either way when it comes time to vote I am prolly gana go with 2K6
|
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Sept 16, 2005 14:23:48 GMT -5
Hmm Felton has a higher rating than Chris Paul
|
|
|
|
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Sept 16, 2005 15:55:26 GMT -5
Well there are only 9 players that were rated in the 90's and I have 2 of them so I'm still pretty confident, but I'de say San Antonio and Detroit are the favorites.
Mcgrady (93)
Bryant (95)
Garnett (96)
Shaq (90)
Duncan (91)
Lebron (95)
Wade (91)
Stoudemire (90)
Marion (91)
|
|
|
|
Post by Dallas Mavericks on Sept 16, 2005 16:15:32 GMT -5
im pretty happy with my team...
pg- jason terry (80)
sg- Corey Maggette (84)
sf- Antwan Jamison (81)
pf- Elton Brand (86)
c- Brad miller (76)
bench-
gerald wallace (77)
Kirk Hinrich (79)
Zach Randolph (77)
Bonzi Wells (74)
Etan Thomas (64)
Jason Collier (61)
i also have a few other players that i couldnt see on the screen shots...so i really like my chances. the team seems very balanced.
|
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Sept 16, 2005 17:00:49 GMT -5
I think it will be interesting (if we use Live) to see who wins. It could be ayone looking at th rankings!
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Sept 16, 2005 17:18:00 GMT -5
hamilton is terrible under-rated in this game. i was expecting mid to high 80s. very disapointing. he is better then billups and prince.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Sept 16, 2005 17:18:38 GMT -5
he is the highest scorer on the team after all. i dont really understand it. and he was second in ast.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Sept 16, 2005 17:20:56 GMT -5
PG- S. Francis (89)
SG- K. Bryant (95)
SF- R. Hamilton (76)
PF- K. Garnett (96)
C- A. Davis (68)
PF- A. Mcdyess (72)
G- M. Daniels (69)
G- B. Diaw (69)
G- J. Dixon (66)
and my other players i know that should be around the 60s, i think im pretty much set. however i really think rips numbers should be a litte higher. like 83 or so.
|
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Sept 16, 2005 17:33:47 GMT -5
J Wil 73
Manu 88
Melo 86
nene 73
Kristic 63
iggy 83
Deng 71
Clifford Robinson 71
Earl Watson ?
Hunter ?
Should be goin far i hope!
|
|
|
|
Post by Memphis Grizzlies on Sept 16, 2005 17:46:00 GMT -5
personally i like the game without ratings, because i can already see everyone declining trades and stuff because of ratins, unlike before we made trades both teams like, not based on video game ratings, but because of our personal opinion on that players skills. but anywho i dont think my team looked to bad i just took a glance. i do rememebr trading posey (72) for allen (73) and williamson (66) so i got a real good deal there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Memphis Grizzlies on Sept 16, 2005 17:49:25 GMT -5
everybody on this board (minus NJ and Dallas) has a signature i made.
|
|
|
|
Post by Memphis Grizzlies on Sept 16, 2005 18:11:32 GMT -5
Diddy- 89
Allen- 73
Richardson- 76
DDavis- ?
Gasol- 83
Jones- 70
Foyle- 57
Williamson- 66
Lenard- 65
Cardinal- 65
thats what ive found so far. not to bad, not that great. ill try to change that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Sept 16, 2005 18:13:52 GMT -5
haha guess what i just found A. Davis and J. Dixon.
A. Davis- 68
J. Dixon- 66
pretty good. actually really good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Sept 16, 2005 18:15:42 GMT -5
but i should say this. i highly doubt these are the TRUE and FINAL ratings. hince, not an official EA games website or anything that i saw. could be their predictions or it could change. i doubt that this is the true ratings. well, not only do i doubt it, it better not be final lol. rip needs to improve.
|
|
|
|
Post by Portland Trail Blazers on Sept 16, 2005 19:21:35 GMT -5
look at thingd like.. ricky davis is a 74 even though he is entering his prime and was a runner up for 6th man last year, yet josh smith who really didn't show that much last year is an 80. I'd say that Smith is one of the worst ratings, but the other thing is there seem to be alot of people like davis who are really solid players who haven't gone up much. with regards to Smith, do you really think he's the second best of last year's rookies? And from your examples, do you really think josh Smith is going to have a better year than Rip Hamilton, because I highly doubt that, just can't see it happening, there is really no basis for them to thinkSmith willl be that good. He was a 9 and 6 and 2 guy lst year, he'd have to make a fairly significant jump to be 4 points overall better than Rip. i already know josh doesnt deserve that high of a ranking..but meh..im not gonna sit here and cry about it. Again..its based on potential...and most particularly hype. Igoudala..and 83?....was he the best rookie out of his class??...sayin that smith is one of the worst ratings is likely...but have you checked out the all the other ratings?..i wouldnt even call it one of the worst ratings..cause theirrr wayyyyyyyyyy too much.. |
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Sept 16, 2005 22:05:34 GMT -5
can someone please try to find the ranking for my players?
|
|
