|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jul 12, 2006 16:27:00 GMT -5
1 YEAR 6 MIL OR 4 YEARS AT 4 MIL A YEAR?
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jul 12, 2006 16:29:21 GMT -5
please answer asap
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jul 12, 2006 16:33:01 GMT -5
id say 4 years, $4 a year
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jul 12, 2006 16:34:21 GMT -5
um oh ok
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Jul 12, 2006 16:38:00 GMT -5
so we are going by total as opposed to per year?
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jul 12, 2006 16:39:29 GMT -5
I would think. I think most people would rather take $16 million over 4 years than $6 million over 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jul 12, 2006 16:41:04 GMT -5
Well personally i'd rather the 6 mil and take a shot at free agency again next year than the 16 mil over 4. I'd rather make the most money per year. But you are the commish and what you say goes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Suns on Jul 12, 2006 16:52:03 GMT -5
It depends on the situation and the player. For instance, a veteran who is on the decline would likely take the 4 year deal because they may not be getting better and likely wouldn't make as much next year. A guy like Al Harrington though may take a 1 year deal and take a shot at proving he is worthy of a bigger, long-term deal.
Ideally, this would be the decision of a Player Agent...maybe next year?
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jul 12, 2006 17:00:24 GMT -5
Definately next year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jul 12, 2006 17:04:27 GMT -5
i say base year because you can always beat the deal by upping it 1 year ya know.
|
|
