|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jan 28, 2007 7:13:18 GMT -5
the draft isnt the only difference, the main point is switching to real life salaries, getting rid of the stupid contracts that we make on here. the vet draft is a way to keep real life salaries and favor the worse teams to even out the field. or favor the best teams that have ridiculous contracts. san antonio will have lebron and wade at 15 million dollars each in our current rules but in these will have them at 12. not much, but it saves money for a big team. you will have chris webber at 20 million dollars in our current rules. that money will disppear completly because webber would expire at the end of this season, versus expiring next season. so it saves you money as well. what bad teams have horrible contracts? theres new orleans with cuttino mobley and thats all i can think of. Dallas has Stromile Swift, Houston has Tyson Chandler and Houston is a playoff team, Atlanta is a playoff team as well and has Peja Stojakovic, Golden State is a playoff team with Zydrunas Ilgauskas, Cleveland is a playoff team with Samuel Dalembert. All those teams are playoff teams, not lottery teams. This would help all the playoff teams and contending teams like Orlando, San Antonio, etc., and barely help the lottery teams because they have picks, they dont get to choose to go after who they want. So what if Milwaukee has the 10th pick in the draft? He wants Vince Carter and has the money to go after him but cant because VC is picked 3rd overall. Im voting no for this right now. Later? Maybe, but not now. |
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Raptors on Feb 1, 2007 14:54:46 GMT -5
BUMP.
Thid is a serious topic, cant' forget about this soon right.
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 1, 2007 19:04:07 GMT -5
We might need to find a lot of new GMs this offseason, I'm a little dissapointed with the activity level around here
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 2, 2007 12:42:12 GMT -5
Wow, it's tied up at 11-11, and it's taking forever.
If this doesn't go through, or maybe even if it does, would any other dominating team be willing to give away one of their starters to a lottery team? I'll give away one of my big 3 if enough people commit to doing so, to spread the wealth out and give other people another chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Feb 2, 2007 16:48:36 GMT -5
just keep the rule we voted on before...... I know my team will go from a decent team to possible contender because I built my team for next year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Feb 2, 2007 16:49:08 GMT -5
The other rule will help people manage money better and not just throw around ridiculous contracts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Raptors on Feb 2, 2007 20:02:53 GMT -5
If nobody else votes, it might come down for me voting as the last straw.
I could easily break the tiebreaker.
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 3, 2007 18:58:54 GMT -5
Why havent you voted yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Raptors on Feb 3, 2007 19:01:02 GMT -5
Why havent you voted yet? I am still thinking about it. |
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 3, 2007 20:20:55 GMT -5
Wow, it's tied up at 11-11, and it's taking forever. If this doesn't go through, or maybe even if it does, would any other dominating team be willing to give away one of their starters to a lottery team? I'll give away one of my big 3 if enough people commit to doing so, to spread the wealth out and give other people another chance. I wanted to emphasize what I said before. If we stick with the same rules, would anyone besides me be willing to donate some good players to lottery teams? You can choose to 'adopt-a-GM' and help them out and give them a new start by giving away a star player. Maybe you could ask for some picks in return. |
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Feb 3, 2007 20:23:49 GMT -5
Wow, it's tied up at 11-11, and it's taking forever. If this doesn't go through, or maybe even if it does, would any other dominating team be willing to give away one of their starters to a lottery team? I'll give away one of my big 3 if enough people commit to doing so, to spread the wealth out and give other people another chance. I wanted to emphasize what I said before. If we stick with the same rules, would anyone besides me be willing to donate some good players to lottery teams? You can choose to 'adopt-a-GM' and help them out and give them a new start by giving away a star player. Maybe you could ask for some picks in return. to be honest, if i won the title this year i was planning on leaving the pistons to become the GM of the worst team available. if i dont win the title if other teams agreed to it i might send out one of my players...as hard as it would be. i might do that though |
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 3, 2007 20:26:41 GMT -5
I wanted to emphasize what I said before. If we stick with the same rules, would anyone besides me be willing to donate some good players to lottery teams? You can choose to 'adopt-a-GM' and help them out and give them a new start by giving away a star player. Maybe you could ask for some picks in return. to be honest, if i won the title this year i was planning on leaving the pistons to become the GM of the worst team available. if i dont win the title if other teams agreed to it i might send out one of my players...as hard as it would be. i might do that though If you're in, I'm in, and hopefully others also. I'll send out Wade, LeBron, or Duncan. |
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Feb 3, 2007 20:43:55 GMT -5
I think I just ended the tie..
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Supersonics on Feb 3, 2007 21:26:21 GMT -5
If the vote is close, no way should the rule be changed. Half the GMs(well, almost half) will be opposed to it. I personally believe that a rule should go through if the overwhelming majority are in agreement. Just my two cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Feb 4, 2007 13:50:35 GMT -5
why cant we try the off season process we voted on before...... it won by a wide margain.... alot wider than this.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Feb 6, 2007 23:00:14 GMT -5
If the vote is close, no way should the rule be changed. Half the GMs(well, almost half) will be opposed to it. I personally believe that a rule should go through if the overwhelming majority are in agreement. Just my two cents. Ok well what is the point of doing a poll if it doesnt really matter what the outcome is. Your not going to make every GM happy. So far i have yet to see anything that has been a majority decision. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Feb 8, 2007 15:42:34 GMT -5
yeah but we voted earlier this year on what to do.... why through that away when it was obvious more in favor.
|
|
|
|
Post by Milwaukee Bucks on Feb 19, 2007 16:08:16 GMT -5
is there a final decision
|
|
|
|
Post by Player Agent 3 [Clippers] on Mar 1, 2007 2:21:03 GMT -5
is there a final decision Yeah no joke, I just hope that whatever offseason format that we use we have the ability to trade after the Finals. |
|
![Player Agent 3 [Clippers] Avatar](http://www.amincousa.com/zcart/images/nba/nba-n24.gif)
