|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jul 11, 2006 11:14:02 GMT -5
Bidding on this free agent will take place here.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jul 12, 2006 15:37:42 GMT -5
The New Jersey offer Ben Wallace a 4 year contract worth $84,000,000. Earning Wallace the maximum of $21,000,000 a season.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jul 12, 2006 17:03:57 GMT -5
lock him up right
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Jul 12, 2006 17:05:03 GMT -5
someone could offer 5 years at 21million and therefore have a better offer |
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Hawks on Jul 12, 2006 17:05:15 GMT -5
well what if somebody else offers the same thing, doesnt committee decide?
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Jul 12, 2006 17:06:13 GMT -5
well what if somebody else offers the same thing, doesnt committee decide? not if it's more years, 5 years at 21 mil beats 4 years at 21 mil |
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jul 12, 2006 17:07:05 GMT -5
yes 5 years SHOULD beat the 4 years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Jul 12, 2006 17:08:07 GMT -5
yes 5 years SHOULD beat the 5 years. it does, first factor is base salary, if the base salary is the same, then the next basis for decision is years |
|
|
|
Post by twiens on Jul 12, 2006 18:48:17 GMT -5
The Seattle Supersonics offer Ben Wallace a MAX Contract.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jul 12, 2006 18:49:23 GMT -5
so you offer 6 years at 21 mil a year?
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jul 12, 2006 19:07:45 GMT -5
He can only offer Ben Wallace a max contract for 5 years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Milwaukee Bucks on Jul 12, 2006 19:09:43 GMT -5
ok so he offered 21 a year for 5 years
|
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Hawks on Jul 12, 2006 19:10:24 GMT -5
yes. the only team that can offer more than 5 years is the team that owns the player.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jul 12, 2006 19:20:00 GMT -5
The New Jersey Nets also offer Ben Wallace a 5 year contract worth 105,000,000. Earning Wallace the maximum of $21,000,000 a season. Thus, matching Seattle's offer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Jul 12, 2006 19:21:12 GMT -5
The New Jersey Nets also offer Ben Wallace a 5 year contract worth 105,000,000. Earning Wallace the maximum of $21,000,000 a season. Thus, matching Seattle's offer. wow only matching instead of offering the 6th year? Could lose out with the player agent |
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jul 12, 2006 19:21:28 GMT -5
...This means that the committee will decide who Ben Wallace signs with. Nobody else will be able to make a higher offer than this.
So everybody knows, I am not allowed to have a say where Wallace goes even though I am in the committee.
|
|
|
|
Post by Milwaukee Bucks on Jul 12, 2006 19:23:05 GMT -5
am i right in thinking that now this means after 36 hours the committee votes to which team gets the player, but this also means seattle can't make any bids on anyone over 7 million (i think he has 28 million in space) because this is holding up his cap?
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jul 12, 2006 19:24:06 GMT -5
Yes, you are correct Milwaukee.
|
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Hawks on Jul 12, 2006 19:24:49 GMT -5
if he doesnt withdraw, it does hold up his cap until then
|
|
|
|
Post by Milwaukee Bucks on Jul 12, 2006 19:26:38 GMT -5
they should take in to consideration a few things. ben wallace wants to be the man on his own team, he went to the bulls to be the best player, he didnt get enough touches on the pistons and that made him mad. he would get all the touches he wants on the sonics and a lot less on the nets with kidd carter posey and walker. just throwing my 2 cents
|
|
