|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jul 8, 2006 19:26:20 GMT -5
Ok, sounds good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Miami Heat on Jul 8, 2006 20:28:46 GMT -5
so the rule for max contracts this offseason is first come first served, then change next year, or are we going to change this season.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jul 8, 2006 20:31:50 GMT -5
I think we are going to have a player agent to solve that. We already have a guy in mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Jul 8, 2006 20:47:27 GMT -5
this sounds real good
B.T.W. does the committee hav meetings?
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jul 8, 2006 21:00:04 GMT -5
Kind of. We have a committee room which we post in and we talk frequently.
|
|
|
|
Post by Miami Heat on Jul 11, 2006 10:32:31 GMT -5
so how is this going to work, will we negotiate with the player agent from the start or is he here just to settle the problem of if two teams bid the max.
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jul 11, 2006 10:36:34 GMT -5
trying to solve that quickly, but nobody else is on.
2 options -
committee will break any multiple offer ties.
or
i will work as a player agent, and instead of posting offers on the board, you PM me them and they are unknown to other teams, ill give the player to the highest bidder after 36 hours, or if theirs a tie i'll either settle it myself or bring it to the committee
|
|
|
|
Post by Miami Heat on Jul 11, 2006 10:46:10 GMT -5
i dislike the second option, because even in the NBA teams know what other teams are bidding on free agents. I think we should make it so that each team that has the same offer has to give either the committee or the league a few good reasons that the player would fit better on their team. then let the committee or the league decide
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jul 11, 2006 11:06:29 GMT -5
Important League News:
Free Agency will take place like it did last year. If you want, you can offer the same contract that someone else did, and then the league committee (myself, nets, dallas, blazers, denver) will vote on which team they will go to, using things such as Chances of winning a championship and playing time the player will receive will come in to factor. Free agency is set to begin tomorrow at 4:30. Any questions?
|
|
|
|
Post by Miami Heat on Jul 11, 2006 11:08:44 GMT -5
sounds good, but what happens when one of the committee members is trying to sign a player
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jul 11, 2006 11:17:50 GMT -5
their vote won't count
|
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Jul 11, 2006 12:29:56 GMT -5
The free agents market is a bit stronger than i actually thought it was
|
|
|
|
Post by Player Agent 3 [Clippers] on Jul 11, 2006 23:41:57 GMT -5
There are some good FA out there but I doubt they change teams.
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jul 13, 2006 14:24:29 GMT -5
For next offseason:
16/30 teams on here want a change for next year. There will be one. It looks like the option that was winning was "If you are over the cap, you can only resign your Restricted Free Agents" with no penalty, otherwise you must use your MLE. I think this is a good idea for the league, will make the teams come closer together, talentwise, in theory. There will not be a hard cap limit, but teams over the cap can not resign their unrestricted free agents unless they use the MLE. Anything else need to be addressed?
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington Wizards on Jul 13, 2006 15:09:10 GMT -5
i thought the option that was winning was restricted FA's only
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jul 13, 2006 15:34:39 GMT -5
For next offseason: 16/30 teams on here want a change for next year. There will be one. It looks like the option that was winning was "If you are over the cap, you can only resign your Unrestricted Free Agents" with no penalty, otherwise you must use your MLE. I think this is a good idea for the league, will make the teams come closer together, talentwise, in theory. There will not be a hard cap limit, but teams over the cap can not resign their unrestricted free agents unless they use the MLE. Anything else need to be addressed? thats the only thing that matter what he said lol |
|
|
|
Post by Milwaukee Bucks on Jul 13, 2006 15:51:57 GMT -5
i thought the option that was winning was restricted FA's only yea he prolly meant to say that |
|
|
|
Post by Washington Wizards on Jul 13, 2006 16:11:42 GMT -5
yea thats what i was thinking, just checking though
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jul 13, 2006 17:47:53 GMT -5
Fixed my mistake
|
|
![Player Agent 3 [Clippers] Avatar](http://www.amincousa.com/zcart/images/nba/nba-n24.gif)
